Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Smith" Results 481 - 500 of 744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm by Erin Miller
Pennsylvania (1986), which allows a judge to find facts that trigger a mandatory minimum sentence. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:01 pm by Bexis
Lexis 1688, at *25-26 n.8 (citing Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 6 January 2020, Besanko J gave judgment in the case of Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications [2020] FCA 2 dismissing an application for disclosure of confidential sources. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Moreover, as Smith explains, in Pennsylvania, one of the four states that used the word “all,” there was explicit discussion of whether “all” included federal elections: William Findley was a delegate to the Pennsylvania constitutional convention in 1789-90 and a member of the nine-member committee which reported the first draft of the constitution, which included the “all elections shall be by ballot” provision. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
It's like filing a King's Bench Petition in Pennsylvania. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Amanda Shanor
By a 5-4 vote in Tandon v. [read post]