Search for: "People v Das" Results 481 - 500 of 687
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2011, 4:41 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
: "Encyclopaedia Britannica Now Fits Into an App" http://j.mp/nb96WT it's just not that good (because rove just isn't that good): "We need to talk about Rove LA" http://j.mp/oLhzaf /via @samwdowning not everyone is a fan of the latest update: "Instagram 2.0 review: Insta-grumble" http://j.mp/oEsvs8 this is good news - no-one is more easily embarrassed than me: "Why being easily embarrassed makes people like you" more http://j.mp/qOIeC7 … [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:38 pm by George
Two people so handicapped do not, in fact, cancel each other out. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
At least that's the position taken recently by the district court in Capitol Records v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 6:46 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" http://j.mp/oRIojL "An Australian victory for transgender and intersex people, but misconceptions continue" http://j.mp/okIRzU probably not: "Any First Amendment Problems With Barring Sex Offenders from Public Libraries? [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 6:22 am by Marty Schwimmer
My brother and I use Frontline, but that is not intended to disparage the good people at Bayer. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:03 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Just what Bradley worries people might find. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:32 pm by Apeng
The People) ECJ rules in intermediary liability case L’Oreal v eBay / ????????? [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:32 pm by Apeng
The People) ECJ rules in intermediary liability case L’Oreal v eBay / ????????? [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
What are the lessons learned so far from the O104:H4 outbreak? [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
At issue before the Court of Appeals recently was the question whether a defendant could - by sacrificing an illegally lenient sentence on a prior conviction - remove a predicate conviction by effectively moving his conviction date from before the current crime was comhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifmitted to after.The answer under the facts in this case was no (People v Acevedo, 2011 NY Slip Op 05582 [decided June 30, 2011]). [read post]