Search for: "People v David S."
Results 481 - 500
of 5,805
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2017, 9:26 pm
” In regards to Ultrasabers v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:42 pm
But that's a decision to be made under the amendment process of Article V. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
Supreme Court case that decided the presidential election, and by David Boies, who represented former Vice President Al Gore in the same case.The case is Perry et al v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:14 pm
Hopefully the new legislature will be focused on creating jobs and not get sidetracked by entertaining bills that attack the people’s right to a jury trial. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:11 am
With accountability built in, he expects his plan will make some people uncomfortable. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 11:22 am
Burdick v. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:30 am
Mandel (1972) and Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion in Kerry v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 5:45 am
As VC readers know (see Eugene’s post here), the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of Lee v. [read post]
21 May 2016, 4:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:53 am
(David Bernstein) Rehabilitating Lochner, Conclusion:The longstanding myth of a wildly activist, reactionary Supreme Court imposing a grossly unpopular laissez-faire ideology on the American people on behalf of large corporate interests—with little concern for precedent, constitutional text, or individual or minority rights—is far removed from historical reality. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:05 am
The US Supreme Court ruled Thursday in Dubin v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 1:30 pm
— Most people don’t realize that Roe v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 12:59 pm
by David Balto Law Offices of David A. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:20 pm
In Bond v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:44 pm
Next week, Congress will be voting on whether to change the US's first-to-invent rule to match the rest of the world's first-to-file rule, and my colleagues on the other side of the unversity, David Abrams and Polk Wagner, have done a study on whether the change would be a good idea. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:35 pm
But the people’s First Amendment rights to see these messages and respond to them must be respected. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:11 am
In Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:55 am
"The DJ also features CAFA Conundrum: Diversity is What Counts, by Reed Smith appellate specialists Jim Martin and David de Jesus, about the controversy over the scope of CAFA's appellate review provision, and noting that the 9th Circuit recently joined "the 5th, 6th, and 8th Circuits in holding that CAFA's appellate review provision is limited to remand orders where a party claims diversity jurisdiction under CAFA" in Chan Healthcare Group, PS… [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:00 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
