Search for: "People v James" Results 481 - 500 of 3,725
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2007, 11:50 pm
The courses use the King James version of the Bible as a text. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  People v Wlasiuk ; 2011 NY Slip Op 09544 ; Decided on December 29, 2011 ; Appellate Division, Third Department  reads like one. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 1:15 pm by Page Pate
v=RYHUwD7vU_4 TRANSCRIPT – My name is Page Pate, and I’m a lawyer who practices Constitutional Law and Criminal Defense in Federal Court. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 5:00 am by James Jolin
Although there has been a great deal of conversation about this decision in relation to the Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
Daniel Wiessner of Reuters reports that lawyers for James Holmes, who is charged with killing twelve people and injuring many more in a 2012 shooting at a Colorado movie theater, have filed a cert. petition seeking review of a ruling by New York’s highest court in favor of a journalist who has declined to reveal her sources for a story about the shooting. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm by Wolfgang Demino
According to Weatherspoon, on February 1, 2008, two senior regional attorneys with the OAG, James Jones and Harry Monck, ordered her to report her recent interactions with a district judge. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
DonovanRethinking People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Rabb, Metacanons: Comparative Textualism, (May 2022).James Diamond, An Uncomfortable Truth: Law as a Weapon of Oppression of the Indigenous Peoples of Southern New England,(Roger Williams University Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2022).Rosemary Teele Langford & Malcolm Edward Anderson, Charity Trustees: Governance Duties and Conflicts of Interest, ((2022) 28 (7) Trusts and Trustees).From SSRN (Islamic Law):Intisar A. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 12:13 am
Although National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:39 pm by Michael Lumer
Given the widely held belief in the legal community that a GJ's decision not to indict in cases such as these is usually the result of a rigged or deliberately flawed presentation (see, People v. [read post]