Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,805
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
Topics this month include:Top StoriesUS v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
In 2008 in K.U. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 9:19 pm
Illueca, Enforcing the United Nations Security Council’s Arms Embargo on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea: A Case Study of the Legal Consequences of the Chong Chon Gang Incident Stephen Allen, Dean v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
For example, the House of Lords has previously said: ‘The media have greater powers of disseminating information widely than other people have, but it has not been suggested by any party to this appeal that the media have any special privileges in law in the matter of freedom of speech. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am
It worries me when young people today at universities are not able to express themselves. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am
A formalities specification that requires the assistance of an IT expert to understand it will deter people from using the procedure and increase the incidence of disputes for those who do so. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am
A formalities specification that requires the assistance of an IT expert to understand it will deter people from using the procedure and increase the incidence of disputes for those who do so. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
The test of dishonesty is as set out by Lord Nicholls in Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan and by Lord Hoffmann in Barlow Clowes… When dishonesty is in question the fact-finding tribunal must first ascertain (subjectively) the actual state of the individual’s knowledge or belief as to the facts. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm
The ICO has warned people working with sensitive personal information that they must obey strict privacy rules. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
Supreme Court Judgment Lady Hale, with whom Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes agreed, gave the leading judgment. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
This overrides the orthodox position at common law (as re-affirmed by the House of Lords in Berezovsky v Michaels [2000] 1 WLR 1004), to the effect that each actionable publication of a defamatory statement constitutes a separate tort which must be considered separately when deciding if the English court has jurisdiction to hear a claim about it. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:02 am
Tessa] Significant News A big news item for me and my homelessness colleagues was announced last week, ending a court process that has taken 2 years to decide what Lord Neuberger meant by the word ‘Significantly’ in the appeal hearing for Hotak v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am
In July 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes) heard this appeal relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm
It is also emphasized that the comparator must be with ordinary people, not ordinary homeless people. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 1:25 pm
, Turner v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
As President, I must act to protect the security and interests of the United States and its people. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 7:24 am
” The cakeshop and DOJ rely heavily on Hurley v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm
Tumey v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
Only ‘a real risk’, rather than ‘conclusive evidence’ of persons being prevented from having access to justice needed to be proven, and the sharp, substantial and sustained fall in the number of claims warranted the conclusion that a significant number of people who would otherwise have brought claims have found the fees to be unaffordable. [read post]
