Search for: "People v Matt" Results 481 - 500 of 741
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2013, 8:00 am by Nick Basciano
 Matt D. gave a full blow-by-blow of oral arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 12:28 pm
The 4th Amendment provides that `[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:42 am by Peter Margulies
This week’s much-anticipated decision by the First Circuit in Mehanna v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by Paul Rosenzweig
The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence was to have had a hearing today on proposed reforms to the NSA surveillance programs. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 10:04 pm by Arnold, Wadsworth & Coggins
Matt Wadsworth is a partner at Arnold, Wadsworth & Coggins Attorneys. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Amy Howe
” In the wake of the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:49 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/internet-archive-v-hoffman Contact: Matt Zimmerman    Senior Staff Attorney    Electronic Frontier Foundation    mattz@eff.org Share this:   ||  Join EFF [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 9:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Two Guantanamo-related cases set dates for oral argument: Al Janko v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 2:04 pm by Bart Torvik
For example, here is the Delaware Supreme Court, in Gantler v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:53 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
And Matt Miles, the scheduled presenter, had no scientific training or teaching credentials. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
These two parties, readers may recall, have faced each other in the Supreme Court not long ago: see Katposts by Jeremy and Matt. [read post]