Search for: "People v Miranda"
Results 481 - 500
of 853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2010, 4:54 am
In Hoffa v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 1:18 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice
'Elstad', 'Seibert' Analyzed in Ruling That Two-Step Strategy Not Used in Post-'Miranda' Confession
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:47 am
The other notable case last week was Arizona Free Enterprise PAC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
(People v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:23 am
If they do, that violates Miranda. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
In 1936, the Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 5:42 am
While it is atypical for courts to find state action in a reactionary (as opposed to a "sting") shoplifting case, the Court of a Appeals, New York's highest court, found in People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 3:39 pm
Prochilo and People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
Based on a review of cases since 1975 that were classified as Miranda issues, Christopher Smith finds that “Justices Stevens and Marshall were the most consistent supporters of Miranda rights. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am
Texas, in which the Court will consider whether a suspect has the right to remain silent before he has been arrested or received Miranda warnings. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 6:03 am
The case is not much known today because it was overtaken two decades later by Miranda v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Katzenbach (1966); Miranda v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Katzenbach (1966); Miranda v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:05 pm
Rep. 4 (Az 5/6/2011) People v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:54 am
I was recently lucky enough to have Miranda Bernabei, who successfully argued the Smith case, as well as a number of others (see below, Doe v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:55 pm
People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:33 am
A recent case in the Kings (Brooklyn) County Criminal Court, People v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:45 am
See Cutter v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:26 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:00 am
Wilson v. [read post]
