Search for: "People v Plate"
Results 481 - 500
of 878
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
The officer saw another man, later identified as Otis Kelly, drive out of the garage in a passenger car with Ohio license plates. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:55 am
Let’s talk about Zivotofsky v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:54 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
I mean, look at your people here. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 6:38 am
See Board of Education v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:52 pm
Given that the Free Speech Clause bars the government from requiring public school students to say the pledge of allegiance, or even from requiring drivers to display a slogan on their license plates (Wooley v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:24 pm
We know this because people are voting with their feet. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:39 am
The first argued case in the new Supreme Court term will be Heien v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 9:04 pm
Of all people to stalk, the police? [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:07 am
These systems can collect data on hundreds of plates per minute and create a detailed picture of the comings and goings of everyday people. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
I mean, look at your people here. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:43 pm
When the police kill or injure innocent people, the victims rarely have recourse.The most recent court ruling that favored the police was Plumhoff v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:08 am
Percentage of cases adjudicated on invalidity merits, NonNPE v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
Fox v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:50 am
Via Eugene Volokh at WaPo Conspiracy, the 9th Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:09 am
Or maybe it is because when you go to a cocktail party and start to talk about building energy codes, people feel compelled to refill their plate of cheez-its. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:09 am
Or maybe it is because when you go to a cocktail party and start to talk about building energy codes, people feel compelled to refill their plate of cheez-its. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:39 pm
Whem and State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 2:17 pm
[Jezebel] * Are you keeping up with Kirby v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 8:55 am
As for trademark, I'm hard pressed to see likely confusion, but given how expansive the doctrine has become, you might not even need dilution, unless a court sees this as a Rogers v. [read post]
