Search for: "People v. Angell"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2011, 10:13 am
Next Tuesday, March 8, the California Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
On November 19, 2010, the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York heard the case of the People v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 3:45 am
’” For the Los Angeles Times, Rosanna Xia reports that Silicon Valley billionaire Vinod Khosla “is now appealing to the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:45 am
Additional Resources: Autism and employment with intellectual disabilities, April 30, 2015, SF Gate More Blog Entries: McNaughton v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:21 am
(People v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:36 pm
“Peering” designates a legal practice of gazing at poor people. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:43 pm
The American people and our Constitution deserve more from federal courts. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:56 pm
Marine Deadly Bus v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:10 pm
The case is discussed here for informational purposes only.Woods v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 6:30 pm
Marin, Marguerite V. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:04 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that insurers must pay for all medically necessary treatment for people with mental illness (Harlick v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
O’Connor, Francis V., ed. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:21 pm
Firemark - Los Angeles Entertainment Lawyers - Theatre, Film, TV & New Media [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:21 pm
CLIENT ALERT: Price v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 11:39 pm
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Comm'n v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:57 am
People v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 9:21 am
Additional Resources: Los Angeles, Long Beach ports truck drivers walk off job over wages, employee status, April 27, 2015, ABC 7 News Los Angeles More Blog Entries: Adams v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:16 am
Other cases from this week City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 6:13 am
Under these circumstances, when the time period charged, namely seven months, approaches the nine-month period found to be per se unreasonable in People v Beauchamp (74 NY2d 639; see People v Sedlock, 8 NY3d at 538), the People are subjected to "proportionally heightened scrutiny" as to whether their inability to provide more precise times is justified (id at 539). [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 2:17 pm
Even ordinary people should care about not driving over bicyclists. [read post]
