Search for: "People v. Barrett"
Results 481 - 500
of 898
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2021, 3:53 pm
FCC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:09 am
Defendant Barrett Byron Staton also used the Businesses to obtain financing for personal purchases that included luxury vehicles. . . .U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 9:43 am
TransUnion implemented this service in a clumsy way by not disambiguating people who shared the same name. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am
Barrett points out the influence of Professor Robert Cushman on Justice Elena Kagan’s dissenting opinion in Seila Law v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
Hart, Jr, (describing Perry v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 2:20 pm
But in the wake of the court’s June decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
Only Justices Thomas and Barrett fully agreed with him on that point. [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 6:30 am
Barrett is Benjamin N. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 12:05 pm
When the Supreme Court faced a similar situation more than 50 years ago, in Ginsberg v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm
The Supreme Court today took the narrowest and simplest route to upholding an obscure tax provision in Moore v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm
Bush v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 4:04 pm
They do not overrule a decision. ] In Moore v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 1:25 pm
But after Justice Barrett's confirmation in October 2020, the strategy shifted. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 6:25 am
The Court has repeatedly, and emphatically, recognized that content-based laws "have the constant potential to be a repressive force in the lives and thoughts of a free people. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 8:39 am
We see this discretion on full display in yesterday's Firearms Policy Coalition ruling.The court begins by determining that the carrying of guns by 18-to-20-year-olds falls within the text of the Second Amendment--concluding that people under the age of 21 fall within "the people," identified in the Second Amendment's, "right of the people to keep and bear arms. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
Kavanaugh, Raymond Kethledge and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 7:26 pm
Third, in promoting self-regulation, such immunity reconciles two seemingly conflicted goals: the need to limit the availability of objectionable content to minors and preserving the robust exchange of ideas enabled by the internet (see Law Professors' Amicus Brief, Barrett v Rosenthal, November 22, 2004). [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 9:40 am
I close the op-ed with this thought: Since Obergefell v. [read post]
