Search for: "People v. Barrett" Results 481 - 500 of 875
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2012, 5:09 am by Susan Brenner
Defendant Barrett Byron Staton also used the Businesses to obtain financing for personal purchases that included luxury vehicles. . . .U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 9:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
TransUnion implemented this service in a clumsy way by not disambiguating people who shared the same name. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Only Justices Thomas and Barrett fully agreed with him on that point. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
Barrett points out the influence of Professor Robert Cushman on Justice Elena Kagan’s dissenting opinion in Seila Law v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm by Joseph Fishkin
The Supreme Court today took the narrowest and simplest route to upholding an obscure tax provision in Moore v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 8:39 am
We see this discretion on full display in yesterday's Firearms Policy Coalition ruling.The court begins by determining that the carrying of guns by 18-to-20-year-olds falls within the text of the Second Amendment--concluding that people under the age of 21 fall within "the people," identified in the Second Amendment's, "right of the people to keep and bear arms. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
28 May 2024, 1:25 pm by Josh Blackman
But after Justice Barrett's confirmation in October 2020, the strategy shifted. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Kavanaugh, Raymond Kethledge and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:31 am by Joe Consumer
Montana Eighth Judicial District and Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Amy Howe
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court in Biden v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 7:26 pm
Third, in promoting self-regulation, such immunity reconciles two seemingly conflicted goals: the need to limit the availability of objectionable content to minors and preserving the robust exchange of ideas enabled by the internet (see Law Professors' Amicus Brief, Barrett v Rosenthal, November 22, 2004). [read post]