Search for: "People v. Blunt"
Results 481 - 500
of 531
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2009, 7:49 pm
People v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 3:45 am
To be blunt, most made no sense. [read post]
6 May 2009, 10:54 pm
There is rarely a direct evidence of discrimination, such as blunt discriminatory statements, such as "We are firing you because we don't like blacks/disabled/republicans/married people. [read post]
3 May 2009, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 10:48 am
At Monday's oral argument in Nijhawan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:46 am
On January 20, 2009, I drafted an entry on People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:25 am
In People v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:22 pm
That instruction would (as Justice Sims correctly notes) mean that even a blunt baseball bat was a "sharp instrument" under the statute. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:10 pm
Let's be blunt -- the attorney here, Cyrus Sanai, is a person who's his own worst enemy. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Biological Paternity Isn't Determinative - Cornelio v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
In People v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:12 pm
The Court of Appeals has held that "[a] defendant may be convicted of depraved indifference murder when but a single person is endangered in only a few rare circumstances" (People v Suarez, 6 NY3d 202, 212. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
In Kopecky v Slovakia (2005) 41 EHRR 944 it was said that A1P1 "does not guarantee the right to acquire property". [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 9:37 am
See People v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 12:16 am
Michael V. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 10:00 am
McCain blunted the media momentum of a speech considered among the finest of any convention, watched by 15% of America, more people than the Olympic opening or the American Idol finale. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:27 pm
But when they're timed right, his blunt remarks can also be a riot. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 11:27 pm
As written in McIntyre v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 10:14 am
Supreme Court explained in Hill v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
It does not, in our view, affect the substance of Article 25, which is concerned with universal franchise and the free expression of the people in the choice of legislature. [read post]
