Search for: "People v. Cook" Results 481 - 500 of 1,320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2017, 12:01 pm by Chris Hajec
He filed an amicus brief in support of the government’s cert petition in Trump v. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 5:17 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
But they conveniently forget that America, after a less than promising start marred by the likes of Dred Scott v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
For the former, benchers would have to do the work; for the latter, other people do the work. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:18 am by admin
Sometimes I sit to lunch or dinner with very small gatherings of as few as two or three people. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:26 am by INFORRM
In this case the Court seems to have taken a less stringent approach than it did in previous cases such as Cooke & Midland Hart v MGN [2014] EWHC 2831 (QB), in which it was held that serious harm could only be inferred in the most extreme of circumstances. [read post]