Search for: "People v. DISTRICT COURT OF FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT"
Results 481 - 500
of 622
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
The order is general or limited to one or more districts or ag [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
It is not rare, in fact, that these procedures and complaints are directed against lawyers, court staff or even the judges personally, which are the subject of allegations of bias and ethics complaints; - Fourth, the repetition of the same questions used by successive ampliatifs and looking for the same results despite the repeated failures of previous requests are frequent; - Fifth, the legal arguments put forward by the litigant vexatious is reported both by their inventiveness… [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In the case challenging the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Another double-trouble relist comes out of Justice Breyer’s old judicial stomping grounds: Chafee v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
Here are our ten favorite judicial decisions (and some honorable mentions) involving drugs, medical devices, and vaccines in 2012.1. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
In a case notable for its unique conception of “meaningful discretion” for purposes of triggering CEQA review, the Fifth District Court of Appeal has created a split in authority that will undoubtedly require Supreme Court review (or depublication) to resolve. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
In a case notable for its unique conception of “meaningful discretion” for purposes of triggering CEQA review, the Fifth District Court of Appeal has created a split in authority that will undoubtedly require Supreme Court review (or depublication) to resolve. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
United States (appeals court applying heightened scrutiny only) A fifth case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
United States (appeals court applying heightened scrutiny only) A fifth case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am
Proponents of this fallacy (such as the sponsors of the IRFA bill) leave out the July 6, 2012 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Intercollegiate Broadcasting System Inc v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 6:26 am
Lastly, a quick word about the case the Supreme Court agreed last week to review, Koontz v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:32 am
After the district court ordered the government to produce the detainees in a D.C. courtroom, the D.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
District Court in Washington and can be read here. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
What theory of judicial review justifies this canon? [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
(The Court of Appeal, Fifth Dist., No. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:26 am
Thanks to last year’s decision in Connick v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:01 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California ruled (in Golinski v. [read post]
