Search for: "People v. Doctor" Results 481 - 500 of 3,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2011, 3:08 pm by Kristina Araya
In People v McDonald, No 297889, the court affirmed the defendant’s convictions of kidnapping, armed robbery, and first degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC), which were based largely on DNA evidence obtained at a hospital. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:06 am
The standard treatment for people in his condition is periodic blood transfusions. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:31 pm by Michele Goodwin
 In the wake of both Whole Woman’s Health and June Medical Services v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:27 pm by Mike Keating
This law was made clear in the case Rhoades v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:48 am by Steven M. Sweat
The Supreme Court of California ruled that balance billing is not allowed in the state in Prospect Health Source Medical Group, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 10:30 am
But not before the doctor writes in the patient's chart: "While an [sic] MRI apparently the EKG electrode was not removed and the patient sustained a second degree burn to the left lower quadrant. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:09 am by Amy A. Breyer
(website omitted due to Blogger limitations; see article) (last visited Aug. 11. 2009) Private studies have flatly rejected a correlation between states that have enacted damage caps and premium rates for doctors. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
For instance: Janus holds that the First Amendment generally bars compelling people to turn over money to a private organization that will use it for speech.[9] But Rumsfeld v. [read post]