Search for: "People v. Drew"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2012, 5:28 am
The data, apparently obtained with a phone company’s help, led to a warrantless search of the motor home and the seizure of incriminating evidence.The majority opinion held that there was no constitutional violation of the defendant’s rights because he “did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the data given off by his voluntarily procured pay-as-you-go cellphone.”The panel drew a distinction between its ruling and a ruling by the Supreme Court last January in United… [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:46 am
We offer a defense of O’Donnell, who partially redeemed her initial flub, plus video — after the jump.Here’s the video clip:In defense of O’Donnell, note how after she drew a blank on the “name an opinion” question, she proceeded to offer intelligent commentary on Roe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 5:09 am
We’ll have to read Professor Maillard’s book “Loving v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:20 am
For example in People v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 2:14 pm
But his meaning was clear enough: he meant he would not appoint the kind of judges who voted in the majority in Roe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:06 pm
Just what processes do J.P.s use - what questions are asked and what records are kept or are warrants just granted (as many people appear to think) on the nod. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:33 am
Karraker v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:47 pm
The case, Dennis Hopkins v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 5:58 am
In the District of Columbia, home to the famous Williams v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Pott v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:40 am
In his speech he drew comparisons of today’s anonymous bloggers with the seventeenth century political writer ‘Junius’. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
In 1901, in Downes v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:58 am
In Skinner v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
A Summary of the Jones v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am
Nicastro drew the attention of at least one commentator, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:58 am
Few people want to return to remote education. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Landmark’s Connection to Congress, The Legal History of the Presidential Management Fellows Program, and Hansberry v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:04 am
And in Cooper v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 11:23 am
Prosecutors said they had no constitutional duty under Brady v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
I think that Sotomayor drew a fair implication from the brief, but it was never stated expressly. [read post]
