Search for: "People v. Edge"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,287
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Questions are now being asked why SBC claim ignorance of any of the events surrounding NERR which also controlled New Earth Solutions Group.The full Isle of Man court judgement is here: IOM FSA v THE ECO RESOURCES FUND / 14 July 2017 / CIVIL - CHANCERY PROCEDUREA feature on the report is available here; Fresh calls for "waste fiasco" inquiryFull updates on the Scottish Borders Council fiasco and other news from the Scottish Borders can be found… [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 7:03 am
Previously the test for “dishonesty” laid down in R v Ghosh [1982] QB 1053 required the prosecution to prove (1) that the actions of the defendant were dishonest by the lay objective standards of ordinary, reasonable and honest people and (2) that the defendant must have realised that ordinary honest people would regard his behaviour as having fallen below those standards. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:54 am
The Supreme Court considered the test for dishonesty and concluded that the second leg of the test propounded in R v Ghosh does not correctly represent the law and directions based upon it ought no longer to be given. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 18 Long v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:40 am
In 2010 during Hartfield v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
The Working Group for Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises traditionally presents a report to the UN General Assembly a few weeks before organizing its Forum on Business and Human Rights. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:34 am
District Court that sits on the edge of Foley Square close to New York City’s Chinatown were the exhibits and testimony of the case of Westmoreland v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 3:23 am
With President Trump in office for nine months now, it is hard to believe that none of his people are yet on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:17 pm
Take, for example, Roe v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:02 pm
In Jacobs v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 12:16 pm
Anna / W&C: On build v buy. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 9:59 am
California’s constitution limits the rights of some property owners to exclude people. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 11:43 pm
What made me smile this week I’ve joined the Man v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm
Only 4 cited © cases: Mazer v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 7:19 am
Instead, the cutting edge research ends up in the hands of businesses who can better leverage it for commercialization opportunities. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 1:08 am
Even if the applicant is of the 'disparaged' group of people does not negate any possible findings under the test. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 9:37 am
IRAP and Trump v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 5:31 am
Bio-prospecting in the Arctic: An overview of the interaction between the rights of indigenous peoples and access and benefit sharing. [read post]
