Search for: "People v. English" Results 481 - 500 of 3,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The English approach, though, is not without its problems. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:08 pm by Bridget Crawford
Last week, Cherokee Nation District Court Judge John Cripps issued a decision (here) in the case of Nash v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:43 am by INFORRM
  The test is not how many people in fact accessed the photograph but how many relevant persons might have. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am by CMS
The Supreme Court unanimously held that Ukraine had a justiciable and arguable defence of duress based on Russia’s alleged threats to Ukrainian people or property. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands… [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:27 pm
On Monday, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Ricci v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 10:40 am
Indiana's approach "discriminates against people who don't understand English," Stephen Beardsley, Arrieta's lawyer, said last week. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Thomas J. McSweeney
” Bracton even makes an appearance in the case Pierson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
At a time when so many people are using social media to inflict attacks on others (no doubt sitting in a darkened room; they would never have the courage to say these things face to face), it is fitting that the English courts recognise that the victims should be able to use social media themselves in their efforts to bring their attackers to justice. [read post]