Search for: "People v. Eugene"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2015, 10:30 am
Grider v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So holds Dixon v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 5:53 am
Indeed, the one nonprecedential decision I could find, National Socialist White People's Party v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:03 am
And in Arizona v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 9:53 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:25 am
But Justice Mitchell is now a controversial figure, ever since he wrote the Alabama Supreme Court's opinion in LePage v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) I recently read an interesting tort case, Stephens v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 3:58 pm
In D.C. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 6:04 am
McCoy v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 4:30 pm
From yesterday's U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:47 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:16 pm
Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:48 pm
Copeland v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:59 am
Naturally, some people might try to defend this on the grounds that prosecutors won’t apply the statute as broadly as it’s written, but will instead focus just on “extreme” cyberbullying; but I think Chief Justice Roberts’ majority opinion in last week’s United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:37 am
In D.C. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 12:32 pm
” People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 12:37 pm
And there are older precedents supporting that, too: People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 5:35 am
(The Court didn’t squarely hold that stun gun bans are constitutional — it left open the door that the presumption might be rebutted by some strong enough showing of public safety need — but the decision is certainly a boost for stun gun rights; see also People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
(Eugene Volokh) We begin by outlining some of the ways that the law punishes knowing falsehoods — restrictions that are generally seen by courts as not violating the First Amendment. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:45 am
Hill and Cantrell v. [read post]
