Search for: "People v. Furnish" Results 481 - 500 of 643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2025, 6:54 am by Joel R. Brandes
  In Matter of Riera v Ayabaca, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2025 WL 395851, 2025 N.Y. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
  The agency agreement required the property owner to apply for any required housing inspections and to furnish a copy of the certificate of occupancy. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
Future-proofing can give rise to serious difficulties when the legislation furnishes the state with intrusive powers over its citizens. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
Future-proofing can give rise to serious difficulties when the legislation furnishes the state with intrusive powers over its citizens. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
Future-proofing can give rise to serious difficulties when the legislation furnishes the state with intrusive powers over its citizens. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
(Green Patent Blog)   Global - Copyright Conference calls on WIPO to boost support for collective management of copyright and related rights (WIPO) Librarians take the copyright battleground in developing countries (Intellectual Property Watch) Creative Commons study on how people understand the term ‘noncommercial use’ (Creative Commons)   Africa Time to follow the example of Nashville? [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am by On the Net
Here is the actual text of Arizona Senate Bill 1108 that authorizes people over age 20 to carry a concealed weapon in Arizona without a permit. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The claims were issued on 6 October 2022 by Hamlins Solicitors on behalf of six individuals: Baroness Doreen Lawrence; Prince Harry; Sir Elton John and David Furnish; Elizabeth Hurley; and Sadie Frost. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
More recently, in Illinois v Wardlow (2000), the Supreme Court found that an individual's presence next to a building in a high crime area, holding an opaque bag, together with his unprovoked flight on seeing the police, who were converging on the area as part of a drug crime investigation, did, in fact, furnish a reasonable suspicion that drug crime was afoot and therefore provided justification to chase him. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 10:24 pm
 Reasons for judgement were relased today (Lacroix v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
More recently, in Illinois v Wardlow (2000), the Supreme Court found that an individual's presence next to a building in a high crime area, holding an opaque bag, together with his unprovoked flight on seeing the police, who were converging on the area as part of a drug crime investigation, did, in fact, furnish a reasonable suspicion that drug crime was afoot and therefore provided justification to chase him. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:56 am
Louis Vuitton v Plesner. [read post]