Search for: "People v. Garcia" Results 481 - 500 of 510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:27 am by Transplanted Lawyer
At the same time, though, these same people are the ones most likely to be outraged by Wickard v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
So… hey, banker-people-that-read-me… I know you’re there… Google analytics, remember… are you starting to notice anything changing for you guys of late? [read post]
22 May 2025, 11:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Jane Bambauer (Florida) and I discussed Garcia v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:26 pm by R Grace Rodriguez
  I tell people all of the time, if you file a bankruptcy you better make sure that the figures closely match what you submitted in your loan modification package. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
Three people who had ties to the organizations were later convicted of federal crimes. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Balganesh argues that the wrong of trolling is that it encourages trolls to sue people whose uses are harmless to the true author/owner and therefore, in the absence of trolling, tolerated though infringing. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
Where the later starts from the premise that all sovereign power is vested in a government whose authority is ordered and constrained by a constitutional document, Chinese constitutional theory starts from the premise of the delegation of sovereign authority from the people to its leading forces constituted as a vanguard party. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Can make sense in individual cases even with good fair use defenses, but Rothman is concerned that courts incorporate these risk averse customs into their legal analysis—example from Ringgold v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
v=e4iLfFTU4iA] And in Beaverton, Oregon a 38-year-old man (Hermelo Juarez-Garcia) from Portland speaks out about his experience with being struck by a wrong-way driver on Highway 217. [read post]