Search for: "People v. Hering (1999)" Results 481 - 500 of 1,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
[Here's a draft of my article, on the constitutionality of anti-BDS laws and other related matters, forthcoming in a symposium at The University of the Pacific Law Review.] [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
App. 1999) (under the circumstances, it was not "fighting words" to call various police officers "motherfuckers"); City of Chillicothe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:33 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
(v) Other showings that are relevant to the issues identified in paragraphs (i) to (iv) of this subdivision. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 7:28 am by Steve Hall
• The rule banning racially discriminatory use of peremptory strikes announced in Batson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
 The written submissions of the Media Lawyer Association can be found here [pdf]. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:28 am by Ken
I detailed a lengthy and tiresome correspondence with him here. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm by NL
The s.202 review letter is appended to the judgment and can be seen here. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm by NL
The s.202 review letter is appended to the judgment and can be seen here. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 1:12 pm
For cases try Gay v Sheeran & Anor [1999] EWCA Civ 1621 or  Newlon Housing Trust v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:47 am by Rachit Buch
It isn’t just friendly, inoffensive speech that is protected: Sedley LJ’s statement (in Redmond-Bates v DPP (1999) 163 JP 789 that “freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having” was cited amongst others to this effect. [read post]