Search for: "People v. Hughes"
Results 481 - 500
of 766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
Rigidity v. flexibility: advocates for more specific defenses. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
The Roe v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 2:17 am
This week's case, Hughes v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
One category includes people who have anxiety about sex and hope that a sexual surrogate can help them overcome their anxiety, thus enabling them to go on to have fulfilling sexual relationships with people whom they will not be paying. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am
Hughes and Senators Hinojosa and Estes' legislation this spring - if that had become law I'd have shut up about it about it by now! [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
Lubin, 122 F. 240 (1903).See Mazer v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Maryland v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently decided the case of Missouri v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
The Hughes Court certainly seemed to head toward a general rule that states must make reasonable efforts to appoint (and thereby pay) counsel for the indigent.Yet, in Avery v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am
Prone to certification even after Wal-Mart v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Florida v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 5:08 pm
” (Shaaban Bin Hussien v Chong Fook Kam [1970] AC 942, at 948). [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
Professor Hugh Hansen moderated the first session, Competition Overview and Recent Developments. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:55 pm
The Supreme Court again reversed the defendants’ convictions in Norris v Alabama. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm
Hughes and Sen. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this column, I considered the case of Maryland v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm
Exemplary damages for libel were upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada in the case of Hill v Church of Scientology ([1995] 2 SCR 1130). [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Under the rubric of special needs, the Court has approved of such practices as suspicionless visual strip searches of people entering the general population of a detention facility, in Florence v. [read post]
