Search for: "People v. Justice"
Results 481 - 500
of 25,646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2018, 10:16 am
On Monday morning Justice Elena Kagan joined Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent from the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:08 pm
In Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:46 am
According to the Access to Justice Foundation there as many as 14m people who are living in poverty and unable to obtain legal assistance. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:01 am
The Supreme Court this morning has decided Snyder v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 1:24 pm
The justices also did not act on or redistribute Collins v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:11 am
Nathan Chapman and Michael McConnellWe appreciate the lively discussion of Justice Chase’s opinion in Calder v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:11 am
The only way to do justice is to provide opportunities for justice. 50 years ago, in Gideon v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:39 pm
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:24 pm
People live in it. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:12 pm
So the justices have to decide. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
The people who wrote Prop. 21 knew full well how to lock in the existing statutory definitions when that's what they intended. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 2:56 pm
In Florida v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:48 pm
Department of Justice and is now Professor of Law at the University of Dayton. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
" Absolutely right.On the other hand, the other quote Justice Rylaarsdam uses seems absolutely wrong to me. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:15 pm
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) Tuesday filed a petition with the Supreme Court seeking a reversal of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:25 am
The justices once again did not act on Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 11:22 am
So now I understand.After defining the term, Justice Ramirez then uses it pervasively throughout the opinion -- like, a half-dozen times. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:17 pm
Justice Hoch says that the facts of the present case are distinguishable. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:47 pm
If not -- i.e., if a subsequent case thinks, contra Justice Premo, that the new case is wrong, and the old case is still right -- then grant review. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm
This drawing is from oral arguments in Printz v. [read post]
