Search for: "People v. Juvenile Court"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2015, 8:38 am
Now that the ACLU has helped win the freedom to marry nationwide through Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
On June 23, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued a merit decision in State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 3:16 am
In later years, the Court has excluded certain classes of people from capital punishment, including the mentally handicapped and juveniles. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 8:44 am
R.L.M Court Finds Juvenile Delinquent Based on Allegedly O [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:05 pm
See People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
R.L.M Court Finds Juvenile Delinquent Based on Allegedly Offensive Instant Messages — In re Alex C. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:17 am
Yes, say two judges on a Washington Court of Appeals panel, in last week’s State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:56 am
R.L.M Court Finds Juvenile Delinquent Based on Allegedly Offensive Instant Messages — In re Alex C. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 11:11 am
In one case, People v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:11 am
In one case, People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
The juvenile court found that the tweets were clearly a threat. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
That's the same statute that was at issue in the Supreme Court's decision in Elonis v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm
People v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:59 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> USA v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 2:55 am
The current Supreme Court has a strong respect for the will of the people, and expressed that view rather emphatically in a decision last year (Schuette v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:23 am
Supreme Court case, Roper v Simmons. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:55 am
Part of Florida’s answer, which the Supreme Court just upheld today in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm
In the case of Aitken v DPP ([2015] EWHC 1079 (Admin)) the Divisional Court dismissed a former editor’s appeal against a conviction for publishing a story which breached an anonymity order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:34 pm
Today, the Court heard argument in Kingsley v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:13 pm
[Her lawyer] warned her that “juvenile courts are notorious for erring on the side of protecting the child” and suggested that fighting the case might lead her to lose her child. [read post]
