Search for: "People v. Kent" Results 481 - 500 of 627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
But it seems to me that people are overlooking the obvious answer: While many people were hoping and praying during the bleak dull days of October Term 2016 that the Supreme Court would finally get some interesting cases, nobody thought to wish that the court would ever actually decide them. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Jordan Brunner
Andrew Kent examined when heads of executive departments can refuse White House orders. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 8:06 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Erin Molan and Nyadol Nyuon have said it would be “almost impossible” to uptake and not “useful” to most people in Australia due to the cost and effort involved, the Guardian reports. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:59 am by Steve Hall
Arizona and the 2004 Supreme Court ruling in Schriro v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
Supreme Court’s 2019 Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am by Frank Cranmer
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Rather incredibly, according to the Kent Online report of the hearing, Wilson’s witness statement attempted to suggest that because people personally insulted him, it was fine for him to insult council officers. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Korinne Dunn
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]