Search for: "People v. Kerr"
Results 481 - 500
of 729
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2011, 2:35 am
In light of the issues presented by United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:34 am
And in this useful summary of the recent oral argument in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:37 am
And people pay attention, because he's a scholar.H/T Radley Balko© 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:19 am
Wickard v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
What got me through land law as a student was Gray and Symes’ textbook, Real Property and Real People. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:39 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the U.S. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 3:27 am
In Florence v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:04 am
(Orin Kerr) Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal has a very interesting article on the dispute among two plaintiff’s attorneys involved in Florence v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:46 pm
(See People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:47 am
" As emerging technologies upend societal expectations of privacy, some legal experts point to People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am
(Orin Kerr) This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:50 pm
(Orin Kerr) On November 8th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 3:56 am
Seattle and Mattos v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
In his report for this blog, Lyle Denniston concludes that “nowhere near a majority of the Justices seemed prepared to rule flatly for or flatly against strip-searching of arrested individuals,” while Orin Kerr reviews the case in the context of Atwater v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am
To my mind, the case is really a follow-up to Atwater v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 11:29 pm
(Orin Kerr) The U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:18 am
Under Terry v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:08 am
(Orin Kerr) I blogged about the panel decision in Amnesty International v. [read post]