Search for: "People v. Levins"
Results 481 - 500
of 568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
The Administration had an opportunity to negotiate and submit to Congress for approval an agreement that would have ensured that the benefits of trade flow broadly to working people, small farmers and society at large, as well as to larger businesses. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 10:37 pm
Murphy suggested in his email that the November 18 live chat with Diana Levine would be a good opportunity for people like you and me to ask Diana Levine questions about this new AFJ documentary film which delves into her drug injury situation, including the looming federal preemption issue. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 7:07 am
We kind of feel like you're our buddies down the hall, with whom we share interesting news.So here are three items from today's news that may entertain you.First, here's speculation that David Frederick, who argued on behalf of Diana Levine in Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 3:32 am
While he knows the case was watched closely by other attorneys, he believes the court's decision in Santos v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:18 am
The much anticipated preemption case, Wyeth v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:50 pm
- Wyeth v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:14 am
Wyeth v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 2:38 pm
For example, Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:38 pm
Levine. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 8:35 pm
With oral argument scheduled for Monday in Wyeth v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 8:23 pm
Levine v Wyeth has been a topic of much discussion in legal circles and the case causes significant concern. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
The Wyeth v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 6:33 pm
It is people like McCain who should anger Limbaugh and Levin. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:26 pm
Levine. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:26 pm
Levine. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:25 pm
Of course, you can also use the Comment feature to let people know what you think about the possible application of this federal preemption legal doctrine to drug injury lawsuits -- the issue that is before our Supreme Court in the Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
As we've pointed out, repeatedly, here, here, here, and here, most recent precedent has either rejected altogether the idea that uninjured people can recover prospective medical expenses, or else has limited such recoveries to environmental torts. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:54 am
Supreme Court agreed to take the case, Wyeth v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:00 am
And based on Pfizer's privilige log, the Peter Rost blog has the answer to who those lawyers were: Judith Tytel, Douglas Lankler, Allen Waxman, Jessica Benson, Carlton Wessel, Jaqueline Wolff, George Evans, Margaret Madden, Beth Levine, Ronald Green, Ethan Posner.Funny thing is, Jeff Kindler was General Counsel at the time, so these are all his legal people but he is not copied anywhere on the list below . . . perhaps he didn't want to know? [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:31 pm
See Farina v. [read post]
