Search for: "People v. Nixon" Results 481 - 500 of 625
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2012, 5:04 am by Russ Bensing
  That opinion, in turn, was probably prompted by the Watergate scandal; it was issued the day after Nixon resigned. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 11:05 am by Josh Blackman
I ultimately did not answer this question, but said the question was open under Walter Nixon v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm by Dani Selby
In 2016, Swarns served as lead counsel for Buck, arguing Buck v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
“Objective reasonableness” is an appropriate touchstone for regulating force, but the ill-informed Graham v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 6:34 pm
  Detroit had started to make the big cars more efficient, but the quality, never  very good, went down even further  as Detroit’s semi-skilled workforce and antiquated manufacturing plants struggeled to adapt to new technologies–the variable displacement Cadillac V-8s  and GM diesel V-8s were partcularly awful. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Canada  In the case of Huff v Zuk, 2019 ABQB 691 K D Nixon J awarded the plaintiff defamation damages of $50,000 in action between two dentists. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am by law shucks
Major firms have laid off 6 people this month (all lawyers) 491 people this year (192 lawyers, 299 staff) 14,702 people si [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
What happens when the President simply thinks that he is not merely above the law but that, in Richard Nixon’s infamous words, “when the President does it, that means it is not illegal” at all? [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:31 pm
Kennedy and Nixon were far too busy debating foreign policy issues (such as the "missile gap"), which tended to overwhelm everything else. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm by Cary Coglianese
Last year, President Trump responded angrily to the Supreme Court’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]