Search for: "People v. Novo"
Results 481 - 500
of 503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
FDA Licensure Process and U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 7:03 pm
He believed that people create and form their own worlds. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:17 am
Porsche A.G. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Most people see the negotiations as an implicit concession that the material is protected by copyright (or by some other type of intellectual property). [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am
Your ad makes fun of overweight people: respond to the complaint. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:11 pm
Tiffany & Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:14 am
Protect Niles v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:16 am
” United States v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:40 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) With this post Flora Sapio and I (and friends from time to time) continue an experiment in collaborative dialogue. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:49 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am
The ACLU will continue to work with Congress to stop the government's spying on innocent people as well as force disclosure about how these programs are used and the secret court rulings that support them. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:27 am
Supreme Court decided Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 6:57 pm
This past September, in Food & Water Watch v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 10:18 am
Pereira v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 3:32 pm
Because the question of subject matter jurisdiction is a legal question and appellate court reviews the court’s ruling under a de novo standard. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
Article 35 of the Law on Trademarks (Royal Decree No: 38/2000) states as follows: A punishment by imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years and/or fine not exceeding [Omani Rial] RO 2000 shall be applicable to any person who: (i) counterfeits a mark registered under this law, imitates such a mark in a manner that is likely to mislead the public or uses in bad faith a counterfeited or imitated mark; (ii) knowingly sells, offers for sale or circulation or possesses with the intention to sell… [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
The recent Parker v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
” Slip op. at 62 (quoting from Gerber v. [read post]
