Search for: "People v. Oliver" Results 481 - 500 of 631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by INFORRM
Bryan Cave associate Robert Dougans, who acted for science writer Simon Singh in BCA v Singh and for blogger Dave Osler in Kaschke v Osler, raised a theme that was reflected by a number of contributors: the new difficulties created by the internet. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed their convictions.Writing for the Court in Kelly v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
In conclusion, this 20-page judgment reads more like Oliver (not Thomas) Cromwell declaring a New Model Media Law. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
” FLASHBACK FRIDAY In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Amanda Shanor, professor at The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, argued that the Supreme Court took a step toward enabling discrimination against LGBTQ+ people in its decision in Fulton v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:14 am by David Oscar Markus
That is because the legislative and executive branches are directly accountable to the people through elections, and its members know they would be removed swiftly from office were they to enact such rules,” he wrote. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 10:29 am
  In this case, Lord Oliver discusses precisely the point of originality. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At OurFuture.org, Sam Pizzigati argues that in Janus v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:41 am by Lucy Reed
Later on 22 January 2015 : Bailii publish a judgment in the case (London Borough of Richmond v Howell [2015] EWHC 104 (Ch) (20 January 2015)), but the woman jailed is named as Olive Howell. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:41 am by familoo
Later on 22 January 2015 : Bailii publish a judgment in the case (London Borough of Richmond v Howell [2015] EWHC 104 (Ch) (20 January 2015)), but the woman jailed is named as Olive Howell. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm by Jack Sharman
  Counsel should therefore remember that he or she is dealing with individual people rather than the institution of “Congress. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:16 am by Ben Sperry
Supreme Court has alluded to the market for ideas in First Amendment law for more than a century, dating back at least to Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes dissent in Abrams v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm by Bill Marler
Of the 134 cases, 52 ill people have been hospitalized and no deaths have been reported. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner has reaffirmed the need for stronger sentencing powers for people convicted of stealing personal data. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]