Search for: "People v. Render" Results 481 - 500 of 4,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
On November 19, 2010, the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York heard the case of the People v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:09 pm
In People v Buccina (2009 NY Slip Op 03568 [4th Dept 5/1/09])the Appellate Division, Forth Department rejected the contention of defendant that he was denied his right to testify before the grand jury where defendant refused to testify before the grand jury after he was informed that, pursuant to the policy of the jail where he was confined, he would not be allowed to change into street clothes before being transported to the grand jury. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:07 am by Kristina Araya
In People v Kilpatrick, defendant Kwame Kilpatrick challenged the constitutionality of the Michigan statute that allowed the trial court to enter an order requiring that all proceeds from the sale of his book be placed in escrow to pay restitution to the city of Detroit. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am by Brian Shiffrin
For example, the Court in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]), considered how Crawford applies two categories of evidence: DNA reports and , fingerprints, comparisons. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:42 pm by Dennis Crouch
Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Michael Kagan
That holding has been hotly debated, but it rendered the special solicitude question irrelevant in the main student loan case. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 8:13 am by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP
Williams alleged sufficient facts to render plausible the inference that her gender dysphoria resulted from physical impairments. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:53 am by SHG
  And in the case raised by Andrew, Welch v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 2:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Second, to interpret section 13(1) as requiring mens rea would render incoherent what can otherwise be viewed as a calibrated and rational scheme of proscribed organisation offences in the 2000 Act. [read post]