Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Wells)" Results 481 - 500 of 1,870
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2012, 2:48 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
  At the same time, decolonization led to the independence of former colonies, and the desire of nonwhite peoples to eradicate the idea of white racial superiority. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm by Florian Mueller
A: Copyright laws differ between jurisdictions, but commentators often overstate the scope of the opinion by the Court of Justice of the EU in SAS Institute v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 2:44 pm
Part V: The Role of the Courts in the Application of Law: Judicial Review, Methodologies of Interpretation, and Legitimacy closes the circle by bringing the focus back to the courts and their engagement with law. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:28 am by Maya Angenot
She also cited the 1917 Ontario Court of Appeal judgment of Campbell v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
  There have been a number of County Court judgments on this issue which have not necessarily been ad idem (see eg our post on Augustin v Barnet). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
  At the same time, decolonization led to the independence of former colonies, and the desire of nonwhite peoples to eradicate the idea of white racial superiority. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 8:41 pm
A unanimous three-judge panel of the California 3rd District Court of Appeal ruled on October 14 in Woods v. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 2:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The notion that joint or common owners of property cannot be charged with larceny is firmly rooted in common law as held in People v Zinke. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
After being convicted in district court, the defendant appealed for trial de novo in superior court, and the jury found him guilty of the lesser charge of simple assault. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 1:12 pm by Judy Selby
Sighs of relief by class actions defendants following the denial of class certification in Hannaford may give way to renewed uncertainty now that a massive class, estimated by the plaintiffs’ lawyer to be more than a million people, was certified by an Illinois federal district court last week in the case of Harris v. comScore. [read post]