Search for: "Perez v Perez"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2014, 3:52 pm
By Linda Perez Clark The use of standard form terms and conditions, without a signed contract, often leads to disputes over whether the parties actually agreed to be bound by such terms and conditions, as was the case in Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
Perez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
Perez, and another in a case with a pending cert. petition, Lepak v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 6:12 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 3:39 pm
See Staples v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:37 am
Departments of Labor and Homeland Security jointly announced that they intend to release a joint Interim Final Rule by April 30, 2015, to resolve the agencies’ suspension of H-2B processing following a Florida federal court decision in Pérez v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 12:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:14 am
In Marlow v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm
Perez, 2010 WL 3036217 (N.D. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 12:44 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:26 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:03 am
By Pamela Wolf, J.D. and Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 2:53 pm
Today, Governor Rick Scott announced the appointment of three new County Court judges to replace Judges Dawn V. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:19 am
The case, Gate Guard Services, L.P. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:19 am
The case, Gate Guard Services, L.P. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 9:41 am
Perez, No. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 7:04 pm
As we continue the analysis of this week’s Connecticut Supreme Court decisions, the court also clarified how employees can prove their claims of discrimination in Perez-Dickson v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 10:59 am
In Commonwealth v Diaz Perez, the Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the allowance of the defendant’s motion for a new trial, agreeing with the trial court judge that the failure of the defendant’s successor trial counsel to investigate a crucial alibi witness, who had testified at an earlier mistrial, constituted ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 4:32 am
Perez-Perez, No. 06-30341 (10-22-07). [read post]
