Search for: "Perry v. State of California"
Results 481 - 500
of 786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2010, 12:47 pm
At the Circuit Court, the case (Perry, et al., v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:27 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:25 am
The supreme court succinctly summarized the court of appeals' position on the validity of default judgments, stating: "The Court of Appeals correctly recognized that "[a] default judgment is just as conclusive an adjudication and as binding upon the parties of whatever is essential to support the judgment as one which has been rendered following answer and contest," citing Perry & Derrick Co, Inc v King, 24 Mich App 616, 620 (1970). [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
" In Hollingsworth, readers may recall, the Court concluded supporters of California's Proposition 22 (which barred state recognition of same-sex marriage) lacked appellate standing to appeal the Ninth Circuit's decision that the Proposition was unconstitutional. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 1:50 pm
State and Carothers v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:18 pm
" The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit just held its Epic Games v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:30 am
Perry, the federal challenge to California’s Proposition 8. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:28 pm
Girardi secured a 4.85 billion dollar settlement from Merck for Vioxx, a 785 million dollar verdict from Lockheed for personal injuries, and a 1.7 billion dollar settlement from the State of California for manipulating natural gas prices. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:37 pm
Howard Berman, D-California, and Zoe Lofgren, D-California, to require states to come into compliance with the International Court order. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:38 pm
06/30/09 SF Chronicle:In his 06/30/09 order in Perry et al v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Perry, a challenge to California’s Proposition 8, banning same-sex marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 11:42 am
Although Boies and Olson also argue that Prop. 8 fails to satisfy the "rational basis" standard of constitutionality, the ACLU and NCLR examine the unique circumstances under which it does:Considering the unique circumstances surrounding its enactment and stated intent of stripping same-sex couples of the status of mariage while leaving intact all of the other substantive rights of same-sex couples, the sole purpose of Proposition 8 manifestly is to establish a declaration of the… [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:10 pm
Perry, which challenged the constitutionality of California’s 2008 Proposition 8 ballot initiative, a state constitutional amendment restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:50 am
These cases involve challenges to the DOMA or to state laws that define marriage to the exclusion of same-sex couples.We here at the Law Blogger have been following this issue over the past few years; here are some of our earlier posts tracking the subject:Illinois Becomes 6th State to Recognize Same-Sex Unions January 2011Same-Sex Marriage Cases Go Constitutional April 2010There are three cases in the same-sex marriage pack that seem to be headed… [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
Perry litigation. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:40 pm
See Perry v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]
7 May 2014, 7:16 am
Of the two, one would prefer to cover United States v. [read post]
