Search for: "Poole v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,428
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2021, 2:32 pm
The recent Divisional Court decision in United Food and Commercial Workers International Union v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Francis v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 11:08 pm
The case was Gideon v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
Just 5 years ago, the United States Supreme Court upheld a taking of property for purely economic reasons. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:52 am
The board ordered him and other unit heads to stop all media contact, but this gag order was eventually lifted.Another change Lewis opposed was increasing the pool of numbers from which the winning Lotto numbers were picked was from 40 to 44. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:36 am
Hill), United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California, Case No. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
Janus v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:20 pm
At the time he allegedly committed these offenses, appellant was the Republican Majority Whip of the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:50 am
United States (1997) and New York v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
With all of these mines closed, and steel production no longer occurring in the United States, much of the state is trying to find ways to rebuild an economy that has still not recovered. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:31 am
The Supreme Court made this clear in its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:08 pm
Timm, both United States Supreme Court cases. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 11:51 am
Moreover, the city and its amici contend that the court has already determined that § 542(a) permits creditors to remain in possession of debtors’ property notwithstanding § 362 in the bankruptcy chestnut United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 6:11 am
The court in Gonzalez was interpreting a provision in Title III stating that “[i]n the case of property confiscated before March 12, 1996, a United States national may not bring an action under [the Act] ... unless such national acquires ownership of the claim before March 12, 1996. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:53 am
Switzerland (no. 2) no. 32772/02, § 92, ECHR 2009 (rearing of animals)[Grand Chamber- GC]; Steel and Morris v . the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, §§ 89 and 95, ECHR 2005-II (fast-food meat industry); Hashman and Harrup v . the United Kingdom[GC], no. 25594/94 (hunting saboteurs); Steel and Others v . the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998 (hunting saboteurs); Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v . [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:48 pm
United States asks whether the government is required to reimburse insurance companies for losses associated with their participation in the Affordable Care Act markets, to the tune of as much as $12 billion, according to the insurers. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 11:30 pm
Sitting next to Conti's IP chief Roman Bonn, U.S. trial lawyer Ed Haug said that it always depends on someone's business goals, but generally he'd not advise clients to litigate SEP matters in the United States. [read post]
