Search for: "Powell v. Powell"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2008, 4:12 pm
Volokh says no, some guy at some other school quoted in the NYT says no, Balkin, Tushnet and Amar say yes, and so now I don't know what's the right interpretation of Powell v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:19 am
He passed the gun to Powell. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 8:22 pm
A fundamental principle of criminal law requires any law enforcement officer following an arrest to advise the arrested person of certain Constitutional rights pursuant to Miranda v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 8:22 pm
A fundamental principle of criminal law requires any law enforcement officer following an arrest to advise the arrested person of certain Constitutional rights pursuant to Miranda v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
L. v the United Kingdom here. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
L. v the United Kingdom here. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
R (CN) v LB Lewisham; R (ZH) v Newham LBC [2013] EWCA Civ 804This is a very important decision from the summer. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:47 am
While the idea of the vanishing jury is not new, this is a good read if you want to learn more about Justice Lewis Powell and his role in cases like Batson v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 1:37 am
Note that, with respect to the last question in particular, the fact that this is an appointment to fill a vacancy weakens -- although it does not eliminate -- the concern in Powell v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 1:51 pm
Here’s the basic issue: In Apodaca v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:48 am
” Judge Black also quoted from an earlier Supreme Court opinion, in Powell v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 5:02 am
Compare with Powell v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 1:14 pm
From Bey-Cousin v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 7:33 am
Of course, it can be hard to craft a sustained narrative about those cases when many deal with relatively obscure statutes that the court rarely examines – such as the Quiet Title Act, the subject of this year’s less than momentous decision in Wilkins v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:18 am
Powell, 2010 Tex. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:58 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:58 pm
In People v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm
Dixon v UK has now reached a conclusion in the ECHR with an Order made on 21/2/12 removing the case from the lists under Art 37 (1)(c) of the Convention.This Order is the Court’s response to a unilateral declaration made by the UK government on 8/11/11 accepting that Mr Dixon had not had the benefit of a proportionality exercise in line with the principles set out in McCann, Pinnock and Powell and that the High Court’s obiter findings on… [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm
Dixon v UK has now reached a conclusion in the ECHR with an Order made on 21/2/12 removing the case from the lists under Art 37 (1)(c) of the Convention.This Order is the Court’s response to a unilateral declaration made by the UK government on 8/11/11 accepting that Mr Dixon had not had the benefit of a proportionality exercise in line with the principles set out in McCann, Pinnock and Powell and that the High Court’s obiter findings on… [read post]
