Search for: "Power v. Biden"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2023, 3:55 pm
Judicial Watch is on the case and has filed (and will file) multiple open records requests and other court actions to expose and try to stop this dangerous abuse of power. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
When the Biden administration assumed responsibility for the case, it did not change position. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
When the Biden administration assumed responsibility for the case, it did not change position. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
In Dep't of Homeland Security v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
During his presidential campaign, President Biden and his advisors repeatedly pledged to review the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:35 am
In 1952, the court held in Steele v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:44 am
The Supreme Court handed down its decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:05 am
In the wake of one its most poorly drafted opinions in the court’s history—the Dobbs decision last year that overturned the Roe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 7:52 am
” The justices also called for the Biden administration’s views in two cases, Flagstar Bank v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
On 24 March 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Hayden v Family Education Trust. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
In Knick v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
District Court in TikTok Inc. et al. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:35 pm
In December, the justices heard argument in Moore v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 9:52 am
West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am
Duke Power Company. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm
Biden and Doe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am
Republicans disapprove of Biden’s partial restoration of the pre-Trump status quo on policy grounds, but more importantly they think highlighting Biden’s actions will help them in 2024. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
The Bush v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 10:00 am
“We are brought irresistibly to the conclusion,” said the majority in Eisner v. [read post]