Search for: "Power v. Internal Revenue Service"
Results 481 - 500
of 827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Review of State and Local Car Rental Excise Taxes Excise taxes on rental cars are a common source of revenue for states and localities seeking revenue that disproportionately comes from nonresidents. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm
Director of Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue, Judge Hardiman’s opinion for the Court held that prior to 2004, taxpayers could establish “bona fide residence” regardless of whether their intent was to avoid tax liability or not. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:07 pm
The Internal Revenue Service followed with 17 percent of rulemaking under the ACA, just above the Employee Benefits Security Administration, with 11 percent. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 1:27 pm
To avoid a scenario in which people would wait until they got sick to buy insurance, because they knew that insurance companies would still have to cover them at a reasonable price, the ACA also included the individual mandate, which as originally enacted required most Americans to obtain health insurance or pay a penalty to the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:27 am
Moreover, the fact that MSU is subject to the state’s administrative procedure and civil service laws, and can exercise the power of eminent domain, clearly favored a finding of immunity. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:39 pm
TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: Any tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by you for the purpose of (1) avoiding any penalty that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service or (2) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:27 pm
No, unfortunately, section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code says that "gross income" means "all income from whatever source," including "compensation for services. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:45 am
Services, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:58 am
” The solicitor general also recommended that review be denied in several more cases: In Airline Service Providers Associations v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design field… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 13 December 2018 Master Giddens gave an ex tempore judgment in the slander claim of Kenny v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Spicy IP) PanIIT Alumni India leads the way in incubating ideas (Spicy IP) Rigging data: IPRs and the impact of counterfeits (Spicy IP) The Competition Commission: separation of power troubles again? [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm
The Internal Revenue Service has issued a warning to US taxpayers highlighting increasing efforts by cyber criminals to steal financial information. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:15 am
1798.140(c)(1) establishes numerical thresholds for enforcement: $25M/yr revenue, 50%+ revenue from data brokerage, or personal information for 50k/yr consumers. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
The Bill’s main objective was to amend the Copyright Act in order to provide for a fair formula for sharing of revenue from ringback tunes between copyright owners and the telecommunications operators; establish the National Rights Registry; and repeal the Internet Service Providers (ISP) Liability provisions contained in sections 35B, 35C and 35 D of the Copyright Act. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 1:57 pm
Cheney v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:05 am
Following after RedHat, we provide free and low-cost services to the open-source community while generating revenue from enterprise support services and hosting proprietary Clerks. [read post]
