Search for: "Price v Price"
Results 481 - 500
of 18,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2009, 4:07 am
Suppose a dominant firm sells products A and B at prices of 8 and 5 respectively, but charges a price of 11 for an A/B bundle. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 4:41 pm
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 11:09 pm
By contrast, at least one state court (Kaewsawang v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:49 am
Grill, The Treatment of Metering in Antitrust Law: The Supreme Court’s Apparent Abolition of the Per Se Rule Against Metering in Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 11:53 am
Christopher Booker wrote about the case of Ethan Williams in The Telegraph this weekend, in an article entitled :When judges defy instinct, it is children who pay the price – We were presented with two flatly opposing views of the story of Rebecca Minnock, who went on the run with her son. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted review in Clayworth v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:28 am
Relying on Summers v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 12:42 pm
The oral argument (transcript here) in the case of Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:16 am
Here: Tonasket v Sargent Cert Petition Questions presented: 1. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:06 am
The court ultimately concluded that the disappointing sales numbers and resulting stock price drop were more plausibly related to customer reaction to the company's public relations issues than its accounting practices (Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:25 am
" The Forest Group Inc v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 10:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 10:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:21 pm
In State of Tennessee, ex rel, Price v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 3:54 am
The price to be paid for the government failing to do as it says, keep its word, prove that it can be trusted, is that the people won’t trust it. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 11:40 am
It was also interesting to learn that the marked rise in cigarette prices after the settlement agreement is much higher than the price increase expected from the mere costs of the agreement. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 6:10 am
Martinez v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:16 am
Hanoman v Southwark London Borough Council (No 2) [2009] UKHL 29; [2009] WLR (D) 181 “The requirement that a local authority which had delayed processing a ‘right to buy’ claim under Pt V of the Housing Act 1985 should deduct from the purchase price the purchasing tenant's rent payments during the period of delay remained applicable [...] [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 10:02 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
