Search for: "Price v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 13,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2023, 6:25 am
Many implementers will be tempted to ask the Controller of Patents to define a reasonable royalty if they consider the offer not to be FRAND.In this regard, the Controller of Patents has way less margin than competition authorities or courts to evaluate anticompetitive concerns beyond pure pricing issues (as it is customary in the European Union and UK).Despite its flaws, the willing licensee/licensor test created by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Huawei v ZTE takes… [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 5:08 am
As the CJEU held in BMS v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 7:34 am
Most banks in the country do not service cannabis companies as marijuana remains illegal at the federal level despite several states legalizing its medicinal and recreational use. . . . [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 11:42 pm
See, e.g., “United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018), and the sequel, “Update: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for Sale (Jan. 28, 2019). [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:14 am
Such a service is regulated only if prescribed by the Secretary of State or specified in an order made by the Treasury. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:28 pm
The decision led to a stock price decline. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 10:28 am
For an example of these problems, see U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
In fact, this is exactly what happened to the interior designer in Tanya M Johnson v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
The United States proposed a broad product market including all shoes. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:14 am
” Section 1, in turn, specifies a price of $100, payable within six months. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:54 am
Audemars Piquet Holding S.A. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
FTC Chair Lina Khan previewed this in June, stating that “The word ‘efficiency’ doesn’t appear anywhere in the antitrust statutes. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
State law varies on these issues and is constantly changing. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 7:52 am
While the events forming the basis of the dispute in BioPoint, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:46 am
Tershakovec v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Court then invoked its increasingly familiar “major questions doctrine” which, as the Court explained in West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm
Instead, again, they cite to Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 10:48 am
Zimmerman v. [read post]
