Search for: "Price v. Superior Court"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
Holding in Art Works, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:06 pm
The Supreme Court in Comcast v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:37 pm
Supreme Court issued its opinion in Morrison v National Australia Bank, the lower courts have worked out a host of issues about how Morrison applies in a variety of circumstances. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm
As I have detailed on this blog (most recently here), due to two Delaware court decisions — the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm
As I have detailed on this blog (most recently here), due to two Delaware court decisions — the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:47 am
Our friend and colleague Marius Adomnica (Gratl & Company) has written this good case note on the recent Tim Hortons class action case in Ontario: The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released its reasons striking the Plaintiffs’ claim in Fairview Donut Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Kramer, Judge, Complex Litigation Department, San Francisco Superior Court Pamela M. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
Superior Court Of California, 137 S. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:25 pm
Department of Agriculture, and the difference between the treatment of "Harvestland" chickens and those of competitors stated claims for violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, fraud in the inducement, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of express warranty, according to the federal district court in Newark (Hemy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 2:17 pm
The June 24 decision is Quizno’s Canada Restaurant Corp. v. 2038724 Ontario Ltd. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:12 am
The government’s Newman petition relied heavily on a 1983 Supreme Court decision in Dirks v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:02 am
” Desai v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 5:04 am
See Cammer v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:05 am
As argued by the plaintiffs in Nor-Dor (at para. 4), ‘[the expiry of a limitation period while the leave motion is pending] cannot have been the intention of the legislature when it enacted this section of the Act”.Last month, plaintiffs in a secondary markets securities class action case involving CIBC and its subprime mortgage exposure were denied certification, even though Ontario Superior Court Justice George Strathy indicated he saw merit in the case.On July 3,… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:48 pm
Teladoc, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 10:41 am
The Pennsylvania intermediate Superior Court had also applied the Supreme Court’s standing rule to the catch-all provision, see Debbs v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
Superior Court (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 137, 163 (Wimsatt).) [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:32 am
Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:14 am
The court also pointed to Bober v. [read post]
