Search for: "Price v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 5,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The U.S. purchasers alleged that the Chinese sellers had agreed to fix the price and quantity of vitamin C exported to the United States from China, in violation of §1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 10:26 pm by Lisa Ouellette
What does Impression mean for pharmaceutical prices in the United States and abroad? [read post]
16 May 2021, 7:06 pm by scottgaille
I am pleased to announce my new article in this month’s edition of the Energy Law Journal: REDUCING CONFLICT AND RISK: WHY PARTIES BENEFIT FROM USING ENUMERATED ADJUSTMENT CLAUSES IN ENERGY CONSTRUCTION AND SERVICES AGREEMENTS Synopsis: As the United States transitions to more renewable energy sources, spending under energy construction and services agreements is expected to double over the next decade. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:19 am by Calvin Massey
  Perhaps that this is the price of free speech. [read post]
Ct. 2398 (2014) (“Halliburton II“), where the United States Supreme Court held that a defendant in a securities fraud class action could introduce evidence of a lack of price impact at the class certification stage to show the absence of predominance. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Eric Goldman
Mahoney attended what she describes as a “Rally” to protest the results of the 2020 United States presidential election. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 2:40 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include: Naomi Egel & Steven Ward, Hierarchy, revisionism, and subordinate actors: The TPNW and the subversion of the nuclear order Marius Wishman & Charles Butcher, Beyond ethnicity: historical states and modern conflict Hoo Tiang Boon, International identity construction: China’s pursuit of the responsible power identity and the American Other Tobias Berger, Worldmaking from the margins: interactions between domestic and international ordering in… [read post]
Cir. 2007), the Federal Circuit held that US patent rights are only exhausted through a first sale “in the United States. [read post]