Search for: "Publications International, Ltd." Results 481 - 500 of 3,176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2021, 2:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
(4) Where an undertaking given by a solicitor is alleged to be contrary to public policy under the doctrine of restraint of trade, is the fact that it is a solicitor’s undertaking relevant to the question whether is enforcement in contract is contrary to public policy? [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:21 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
For instance, many international contracts choose English courts as their preferred venue for litigation. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Creative Resins International Ltd v Glasslam Europe Ltd [2006] EWHC 3159 (QB). [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Natt Gantt, II, Reframing the Wellness Challenges in the Legal Profession as Opportunities for Christian Lawyers to Be Salt and Light, (16 The Christian Lawyer 3 (Fall 2020)).Barry Winston Bussey, Blazing the Path: Freedom of Conscience as the Prototypical Right, (Supreme Court Law Review 2nd Series, volume 98, 2020).Isaac Sommers, Suffering for Her Faith: The Importance of an Intersectional Perspective on Gendered Religious Persecution in International Law, (Harvard… [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
At the same time claimants and their lawyers were inhaling the sweet smell of springtime success in the guise of PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:22 am by Andrew Dickinson
Amidst a raft of judgments and opinions handed down by the CJEU on 6 September 2012, are several of note which relate to the EU private international law instruments, as follows: Brussels I Regulation Judgment: Case C-619/10, Trade Agency Ltd v Seramico Investments – application of Arts. 34(1) and (2) to the enforcement of an English default judgment, including an assessment as to whether the enforcement of a judgment given in default of appearance, without reasons, may… [read post]
6 May 2020, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
It is described as a “computer-aided transcript prepared from the stenographic notes of Opus 2 International Ltd” (official court transcribers). [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:46 am
& 3 Ors v Chocosuisse Union Des Fabricants Suisses Never too late 89 [week ending on Sunday 27 March] – Cricket and copyright in England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd & Anor v Tixdaq Ltd & Anor | Are business models simply jargon? [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
In these circumstances and absent an error of principle, an appellate court will be very cautious in differing from the judge's evaluation: see SmithKline Beecham's Patent [2006] RPC 323 at [38] per Lord Hoffmann; Halliburton Energy Services Inc v Smith International (North Sea) Ltd and anor [2006] EWCA Civ 1715 at [24] to [25] per Jacob LJ" 3. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, in the earlier Petroceltic International plc v Aut O’Mattic A8C Ireland Ltd (High Court, unreported, 20 August 2015, amended 8 September 2015; noted here (pdf) and here (pdf)) (see Irish Independent | Irish Times) Baker J not only gave an order requiring the defendant to identify an account-holder but also granted an injunction requiring the defendant to remove allegedly defamatory posts from a blog hosted on its site. [read post]