Search for: "R. R. D. v. Holder" Results 481 - 500 of 905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2014, 1:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Our previews of the newest additions to the Illinois Supreme Court’s civil docket continue with Hadley v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Phoenix lawyer Vladimir Gagic on his blog, the Arizona Criminal Law & Sex Crimes Post USDA to Ramp Up Drug Residue Testing for Meat and Poultry – Washington, DC reporter Helena Bottemiller on Food Safety News  Attorney General Eric Holder Responds to Contempt of Congress Vote – Illinois lawyer Brian Zeeck of Hinshaw Culbertson on the firm’s White Collar Crime & Internal Investigations Blog How Stern v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Cases and items concerning equal employment opportunitySource: EEO/iNews - iNews Related to Equal Employment Opportunity, © 2008 John D. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
You can separately subscribe to the Online edition of the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting 'all posts' or 'IP on the net' at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Australia: Hollywood studios commence proceedings in the Federal Court against Australian ISP, iiNet, over BitTorrent piracy (TorrentFreak) (LawFont) (Recording Industry vs The People) (Techdirt) US: Judge allows Jones Day hyperlink… [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:00 am
(Creative Commons) Copyright Office hearing on proposed exemptions to DMCA ban on DRM circumvention (EFF) (Ars Technica) Open educational resources and implementation of the US Recovery Act (Creative Commons) Twitter and the DMCA: A fine mess (The Trademark Blog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – Apple sued by BluWiki operator OdioWorks, seeking declaratory judgment that its postings do not violate DMCA (Ars Technica) (EFF) Google – District… [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: False marking intent to deceive may be inferred from marking of expired patent numbers: Patent Compliance Group Inc. v. [read post]