Search for: "REYNOLDS v. GRANT"
Results 481 - 500
of 599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2010, 3:28 pm
The Second Circuit will grant a motion for judgment as a matter of law "only if 'a reasonable jury would not have a legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for the [non-movant] on that issue.'" Cameron v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in… [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 6:04 am
Supreme Court partially granted a motion to stay the lower court’s injunction pending further appellate litigation. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
He was granted access by the judge, however. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm
The Reynolds defence, for example, has been discussed in courts across the Commonwealth, e.g. in Canada (Grant v Torstar [2009] SCC 61). [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:33 pm
Unlike the prohibition on the possession and use of marijuana upheld in Gonzales v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:28 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
Though the plan created districts roughly equal in total population, the appellants contend that it nevertheless contains “gross disparities in voters or potential voters,” and thereby runs afoul of the Fourteenth Amendment’s “one person, one vote” principle under Reynolds v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
Section 4 - The defence of publication on a matter of public interest Section 4 abolishes the common law defence of ‘Reynolds qualified privilege’/journalistic qualified privilege (evolved from the dicta in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [1999] UKHL 45) and replaces it with the defence of ‘publication on a matter of public interest’. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm
A number of victims of press abuse have been granted leave to pursue a judicial review action on the basis the Government’s failure to implement Leveson Two. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm
[UPDATE, 12:45 p.m.: The cert. papers in the petitions discussed below are now available at the bottom of this post.] [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 2:09 pm
Committees, including select committees, are typically empowered to create their own procedural rules for issuing subpoenas—most often by majority vote, but sometimes the authority is granted to a single chairperson. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:31 am
Carr and Reynolds v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 5:24 am
In Howsam v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
Part I – Spicy IP), India: Discussion of grant of Indian patents to Cipla for Fosamax derivative and Nexium derivative: (Spicy IP), India: Draft National Biotechnology Regulatory Authority Bill: (Spicy IP), Ivory Coast: Ivorians increasingly choose fake medicines on price: (Afro-IP), Mexico: New Mexican medicaments approvals regime: an early report: (IP tango), UK: Leave to appeal refused in trade mark infringement proceedings between Eli Lilly and 8PM Chemist concerning the… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am
Photo: Leo Reynolds/Flickr Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
