Search for: "ROBERTS V COMMERCE" Results 481 - 500 of 1,667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2012, 6:33 am by Cormac Early
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr provides a primer on the history of the Commerce Clause and its applications. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Chief Justice Roberts delivered today’s second opinion. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:00 am by Michelle Ghetti
And, although Chief Justice John Roberts joined the majority opinions in both District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:05 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Robert Powers, the oral argument held before the Board on January 14, 2015. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:08 am by Rebecca Eisenberg
Eisenberg is the Robert & Barbara Luciano Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School Alice Corporation v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:43 am by Steve Vladeck
And the absence of deference on the Article III question is bolstered by the Supreme Court's far-more-formalistic approach to departures from Article III, as typified by Chief Justice Roberts's opinion for the majority in Stern v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:50 am by Don Burton
  The panel consisted of two of the Southern District’s three district judges, Robert R. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:53 am by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
" "The individual mandate cannot be upheld as an exercise of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause," Roberts wrote. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
Information, commerce, goods, and services now move freely and rapidly throughout the globe. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
Robert Loeb and Sarah Grant argued that the Eastern District of Virginia’s ruling in Al Shimari, et. al. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am by Nabiha Syed
  Tomorrow, the Court will consider whether Arizona law can sanction employers who hire undocumented workers in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Even though Congress cannot forbid firearms in school zones under the Commerce Power (as the Court said it cannot in United States v. [read post]