Search for: "Reed v. Mai" Results 481 - 500 of 2,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am by Raj Desai, Matrix
In a judgment handed down on 17 July 2013, the Supreme Court (leading opinion of Lord Sumption, with which Lords Hope, Clarke, and Reed agreed, and a separate opinion of Lord Carnwath concurring in the result but not some of the reasoning) rejected a challenge to the Secretary of State’s power to operate the scheme of licensing educational institutions to sponsor non-European Economic Area (EEA) migrants to come to the UK to study under Tier-4 of the points-based visa system. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
  The decision last Tuesday in Reed Elsevier, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
Lord Phillips gave the lead judgment, with which Lord Mance, Lord Reed, Lord Clarke, Lord Brown and the Lord Chief Justice (Lord Judge), agreed. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court also heard argument in the case of John Doe v Reed. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 12:22 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Willie Reed, No. 105,307 (Wyandotte)Direct appeal; Agg indecent libertiesRonald L. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
This is an important development, not least because the McInerney Homeshurdle is a high one (see, eg, SZ (Pakistan) v Minister for Justice [2013] IEHC 95 (01 March 2013); Nee v An Bord Pleanala [2013] IEHC 584 (29 October 2013); Kilarden Investments Ltd v Kirwans (Galway) Ltd [2013] IEHC 602 (01 November 2013); Rughoonauth v Minister for Justice [2017] IEHC 241 (24 April 2017); English… [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 7:11 pm
May 30, 2007).* Agreeing to get one's ID is a "thin reed" on which the government can support an entry by the police to follow the person to get it. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am by JB
Or is it better understood as a deferral of the question, like Reed v. [read post]