Search for: "Reed v. Mai"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
FEC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Carson v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 12:19 pm
Guidance on “Filing TINs” v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:00 am
In the case of Ungurian v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 9:56 am
Mangual v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 1:00 am
In the case of Winters v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 11:00 pm
Beck of the Philadelphia office of the Reed Smith law firm for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:46 am
Access to legal aid remains limited - https://atjf.org.uk/In the momentous case of Unison v The Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51 (the tribunal fees case) Lord Reed explained why this is so important – “Courts exist in order to ensure that the laws made by Parliament, and the common law created by the courts themselves, are applied and enforced. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:21 pm
The original two judgments can be found here : A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWFC 38 (11 May 2020) (Main judgment) A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWHC 1162 (Fam) (11 May 2020 (Original decision to anonymise) The latest judgment can be found here : PA Media Group v London Borough of Haringey & Ors [2020] EWHC 1282 (Fam) (20 May 2020) You can read Louise Tickle’s tweet thread here : Our team… [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:01 am
Thomas 19-1201Issue: Whether a sign regulation containing an exception for on-premises signs, for which both commercial and noncommercial speech may qualify, violates the First Amendment under the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Reed v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:04 am
He said, “I don’t see how that gets you out of the content category” under Reed v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 11:24 am
See also Reed Elsevier, Inc. ex rel. [read post]
1 May 2020, 8:29 am
Reed v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:54 am
Lee v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:42 am
At stake in the first issue is how to interpret a key Supreme Court opinion from 2015: Reed v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:16 am
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 11:36 am
The new law, effective on the May 1, 2021, following an amendment by Governor Northam to delay the effective date, applies to all non-exempt employees, except certain handicapped workers under 29 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:58 am
Damages for recovery of the costs of surrogacy On 1 April 2020, Lord Reed announced by video link the Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] UKSC 14, on appeal from [2018] EWCA Civ 2832. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:02 am
Lord Reed considered that the lower courts had misunderstood the principles governing vicarious liability, and saw that the matter would have to be considered entirely afresh by the Supreme Court.The first matter was to consider the matter under the test set out in Dubai Aluminium, which required the court to consider whether "...the disclosure of the data was so closely connected with acts [Mr Skelton] was authorised to do that, for the purposes of the liability of his employer to… [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:02 am
Lord Reed considered that the lower courts had misunderstood the principles governing vicarious liability, and saw that the matter would have to be considered entirely afresh by the Supreme Court.The first matter was to consider the matter under the test set out in Dubai Aluminium, which required the court to consider whether "...the disclosure of the data was so closely connected with acts [Mr Skelton] was authorised to do that, for the purposes of the liability of his employer to… [read post]
