Search for: "Richards v. Georgia"
Results 481 - 489
of 489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Richard Clarke, commander of Special Operations Command; and Gen. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
But obstruction of Congress is now all but certain to be introduced as well, just as it was five decades ago when the House Judiciary Committee voted for articles of impeachment against then-President Richard Nixon. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm
On August 15, 2016, the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) identified raw scallops served at Genki Sushi restaurants on Oahu and Kauai as a likely source of an ongoing hepatitis A outbreak. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
— Richard Burgess, The Advocate, October 29, 2009 The city has agreed to build a new sewage treatment system that utilizes wetlands to clean wastewater and pay a $50,000 penalty to end a 9-year-old federal Clean Water Act lawsuit, according to court documents. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
AI Index: AMR 51/087/2007 When a capital defendant seeks to circumvent procedures necessary to ensure the propriety of his conviction and sentence, he does not ask the State to permit him to take his own life. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
John Reed Stark As I noted in a post at the time, on February 20, 2018, the SEC issued its guidance for cybersecurity-related disclosures. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm
John Reed Stark Earlier this week, media reports circulated that this past spring Google had exposed the private data of thousands of the Google+ social network users and then opted not to disclose the issue, in part because of concerns that doing so would draw regulatory scrutiny and cause reputational damage. [read post]
