Search for: "Robert D. Thomas"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,406
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2009, 8:37 am
Levine Docket Filing | Questions Presented Case Number: 06-1249 On Appeal From: SC-VT Date Argued: November 3, 2008 Date Decided: March 4, 2009 6-3; Affirmed Majority: Stevens(m), Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer(c), Thomas(c) Dissent: Alito(d), Roberts, Scalia Days between argument and opinion: 121 The Court revisited the always familiar issue of pre-emption that it ruled on earlier this year in Altria Group v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:59 am
Posted by Lizanne Thomas, Robert A. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:49 pm
Roberts wrote Fulton, Thomas wrote Nestle, Breyer wrote California, and Gorsuch wrote NCAA. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Lather; rinse; repeat.To be clear, I'd rather that the U.S. win in Rahimi based on the kind of inconsistency I've just described than that the U.S. lose. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 10:23 am
Thomas v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 7:37 am
Justice Kagan wrote the opinion for a non-ideological majority that included Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Breyer, and Sotomayor. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
That proposition is neither novel nor demanding; as Chief Justice Roberts points out, it was the central holding of State Farm. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
Joe Marshall; Robert Slaughter; Thomas Mazzucco; Kathryn Bardini; Dr. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:52 am
Justice O’Connor wrote a concurrence, joined by Justices Scalia and Thomas, that would not have so “recharacterize[d] and narrow[ed]” the Young doctrine.) [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:00 pm
Both here -- in the arbitration context -- as well as elsewhere.So let's hear it for the Ginsberg-Scalia-Kennedy-Souter-Thomas party. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:44 am
Borroni-Bird, and Lawrence D. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
Melvin Urofsky, Louis D. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 6:05 am
Supp. 1053 (D. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 6:25 pm
Thomas School of Law Edward J. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
THOMAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 4:08 am
Robert M. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:56 am
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Robert Gordon suggests that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:07 am
Thomas), Barak D. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am
Name Appearances Paul D. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:10 pm
§ 314(d), which bars judicial review of “[t]he determination … whether to institute an inter partes review,” applies even when no institution decision is challenged to preclude review of U.S. [read post]
